Eismann
Chicken Chips
1000g
BARCODE:4059699085610
PACKAGING:Pack
COUNTRIES:France, Germany
Health
Nutrition
Nutrition facts
| Nutrition facts | As sold for 100 g / 100 ml | Compared to: Chickens |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | ~ 529.7 kJ (129 kcal) | 634.033 kJ (152 kcal) (-16%) |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 6.472 g (-86%) |
| Saturated fat | ? | 1.657 g |
| Carbohydrates | 13.3 g | 2.892 g (+360%) |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 0.517 g (+326%) |
| Dietary fiber | ? | ? |
| Proteins | 15.9 g | 19.617 g (-19%) |
| Salt | ? | 0.867 g |
| Fruits, vegetables and legumes | ? | ? |
Nutrition facts (Detailed data)
| Nutrition facts | As sold for 100 g / 100 ml | As sold Per 100 g (packaging) |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | ~ 529.7 kJ (129 kcal) | ? (129 kcal) |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Saturated fat | ? | ? |
| Carbohydrates | 13.3 g | 13.3 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 2.2 g |
| Dietary fiber | ? | ? |
| Proteins | 15.9 g | 15.9 g |
| Salt | ? | ? |
| Fruits, vegetables and legumes | ? | ? |
Ingredients
Ingredients List
NO_INGREDIENTS_DATA
Ingredients analysis
Palm oil free
Unknown
Palm oil content unknown
Vegan
Unknown
Vegan status unknown
Vegetarian
Unknown
Vegetarian status unknown
Food Processing
NOVA group
NOVA group cannot be calculated because ingredients are missing.
How NOVA works
The NOVA classification assigns food products into 4 groups based on their degree of processing:
1. Unprocessed or minimally processed foods
2. Processed culinary ingredients
3. Processed foods
4. Ultra-processed food and drink products
Additives
No additives detected or data is missing.
Environment
Green-Score, origins bonus, and transportation impact are shown for Worldwide .
Green Score
Overall grade
Unknown environmental impactAbout Green-Score
The Green-Score is an experimental score that summarizes the environmental impacts of food products.
Current scope
The Green-Score was initially developed for France and it is being extended to other European countries.
The Green-Score formula is subject to change as it is regularly improved to make it more precise and better suited to each country.
Select a country to include the full impact of transportation in the final score.
Green-Score availability
We could not compute the Green-Score of this product because some data is missing.
A more precise category, ingredients list, origins or packaging data can unlock the computation.
Bonuses and maluses
Declared origins
Origins of ingredients are missing for this product.
Ingredients need to be completed before the transportation bonus can be computed precisely.
Packaging impact
Packaging with a medium impact
Malus: -10
Packaging score: 0
Packaging
Packaging impact
Packaging with a medium impact
Malus: -10
Packaging score: 0
Packaging components
| Shape | Material | Recycling | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Packet | Unknown | Unknown | High |
Declared packaging
Pack
Data precision
The packaging information is not sufficiently precise to compute the most accurate packaging impact.
Exact shapes and materials of all packaging components help improve the Green-Score.
Transportation
Declared origins
Origins of ingredients are missing for this product.
Ingredients need to be completed before the transportation bonus can be computed precisely.
Forest footprint
Forest footprint
High risk of deforestation
Presence of one or more ingredients at risk of deforestation, with high risk given their quantity, origin and/or labels.
Forest Footprint
The Forest Footprint is a methodology developed by the association Envol Vert to estimate the risk of deforestation related to our consumption.
→ More information on the methodology
Forest Footprint grade:
D
Presence of one or more ingredients at risk of deforestation, with high risk given their quantity, origin and/or labels.
Total Forest Footprint:
2.145
m² per kg of food
Deforestation risk details
Ingredients requiring soy
The Forest Footprint is calculated by taking into account the ingredients whose production requires soybeans, the cultivation of which is linked to deforestation
Primary ingredient grade: D
Total Forest Footprint: 2.145 m² per kg of food
Chicken and egg production, even when raised in France, contributes significantly to deforestation through their feed: soy. France imports two-thirds of its soy from Brazil, where its cultivation contributes to the destruction of the Amazon.
Labels
The presence of certain labels can greatly help reduce the risk of deforestation, through the presence of environmental criteria and/or through better remuneration of producers.
Data Source
Product data comes from Open Food Facts. Food Benchmark also adds translations, category comparisons and explanatory calculations.
The database is licensed under ODbL 1.0, individual contents under DbCL 1.0, and product photos under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Product added on July 25, 2019 at 5:09:27 PM UTC by date-limite-app .
Last edit on March 17, 2026 at 11:23:29 PM UTC by new-nutrition-bot .
Product page also edited by date-limite-app, new-nutrition-bot, packbot, prepperapp.